Friday, July 15, 2011

Updated McCourt Enterprise org chart.

Posted by Josh Fisher at 12:14 PM
Reactions: 

31 comments:

  1. So, down near the bottom on the left, the Los Angeles Dodgers LLC "Teamco" - like everything else ultimately 100% owned by the McCourt Limited Partnership - owns, among other things, CPL Holding Company I LLC and CLP Holding Company II LLC. These in turn *jointly* own Camp Management LLC. What is the point in having it jointly owned by two entitities both of which are 100% owned by the same parent entity, other than an intention to obfuscate?

    Also, at the very top, The McCourt Company Inc. is a 10% General Partner, while Frank Court, Jr. himself, the person is a 90% Limited partner in the McCourt-Broderick Limited Partnership, incorporated in Massachusetts, which owns everything on the page (aside maybe from the Dodgers Deam Foundation and ThinkCure who don't appear to be owned by anyone).

    Who owns The McCourt Company? (Is some Broderick involved?) And how does its status as a General Partner while Frank is a 90% Limited Partner affect Frank's liabilities?

    ReplyDelete

  3. He should go design a Dodgers Rubix Cube.....disgusting and depressing.

    ReplyDelete

  4. Before Frank came to town the org chart had just one line between two boxes - the Dodgers, and the city.

    ReplyDelete

  5. ORG CHART POST BANKRUPTCY & IRS PAYMENT:

    Salvation Army 1 bedroom apartment -------- Frank McCourt
    I
    I
    I
    1992 VW Bus

    New wealthy husband and fancy home --------Jamie ????? (new name)
    I
    I
    I
    2012 Bentley Coupe

    Los Angeles Dodger Fans -------- New Owner
    I
    I
    I
    A Breath of Fresh Air

    ReplyDelete

  6. Can MLB prevent owners from incorporating in Delaware?

    ReplyDelete

  7. All of this has to be undone in the bankruptcy court. . . . What a cruel, ridiculous joke. . . .

    ReplyDelete

  8. Wonder what Elysian Park productions does? McCourt College Street?

    ReplyDelete

  9. I think the general partner raiding the piggy bank of his sub-entities pierces any veil he wished to cast.

    ReplyDelete

  10. berkowit28 wrote:

    "What is the point in having it jointly owned by two entitities both of which are 100% owned by the same parent entity, other than an intention to obfuscate?”

    My guess is that the holding companies are used to shuffle properties around, or to put losses in one company for capital gains/losses and EBITDA reasons. It is more of a way to help the balance sheet of a property management company, or a real estate development company.

    Basically the holding companies are more for accounting and tax reason than for purely business decisions. The huge shell companies are also used for loans , given the holding companies are the ones listed on the loan documents.

    However, it is more gimmicks than sound business decisions. the division of assets into separate companies is more the sign of a wheeling dealing property developer than a financial acumen sports owner.

    ReplyDelete

  11. Watch for Janice Hahn to introduce a bill in Congress to take away MLB's antitrust exemption (judicially created in 1922 - Oliver Wendell Holmes had a bad day that day). . . The 'thinking' (and I use the term loosely) was that the Sherman Anti-Trust Act applies only to business monopolies. . . 'sports' monopolies were not included by Congress (or so the Court said). Since baseball was a 'sport', and not a 'business', baseball was ruled exempt.

    Time to confront that fallacy. . . That will open things up for the people of LA (not the City. . . the people) to buy the team (100,000 people at $10K per person. . . 200,000 people at $5K per person. . . is $1 Billion for Frank to go away. . . . .

    If Frank has half a brain, he'll take the deal, buy out Jamie, and find some other line of 'work'. . .

    ReplyDelete

  12. Which rectangle has the minotaur?

    ReplyDelete

  13. LOL_WHAT?? Minotaur??? where did you get it?? strange, we don't talking about it there

    ReplyDelete

  16. I would like to see more details about this topic.

    ReplyDelete

  17. Thank you for information you been putting on making your site such an interesting .I gave something for my information. I'll be visiting your site again.Thank you very much

    ReplyDelete

  18. Photos are great this is really interesting and nice!

    ReplyDelete

  19. Fabulous post! I really enjoyed that.

    ReplyDelete

  20. Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job.

    ReplyDelete

  21. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website.

    ReplyDelete

  24. This is a nice post in an interesting line of content.Thanks for sharing this article, great way of bring such topic to discussion. Inspiring, as well. Thanks for sharing such inspiring experience with us. Great blog, congrats! Gakuran

    ReplyDelete

  25. I would really like you to become a guest poster on my blog.”`,”;
    company registration dubai

    ReplyDelete

  26. It’s rare knowledgeable folks within this topic, but you appear to be guess what happens you are discussing! Thanks
    Dubai Auditors

    ReplyDelete

  27. That article is so interesting and makes a very nice image in my mind. Thank you for sharing this info with us!

    ReplyDelete

  28. Very entertaining information. found a lot of things for yourself useful. Thx!!

    ReplyDelete

  30. This is a great blog and very engaging too. Excellent work that’s not really much coming from an amateur publisher like me, but it’s all I could think after enjoying your posts. Excellent grammar

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)